|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 21-24
An in vitro investigation of a newer intracanal medicament Nisin on Enterococcus faecalis in comparison with chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide
Suneel Kumar Chinni1, Ashok Baskaran Veni2, Manali R Srinivasan3, Indra Rajamani2
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics,Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India
3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics,Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India
|Date of Web Publication||29-Jul-2013|
Suneel Kumar Chinni
Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Pillyarkuppam, Puducherry
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim: To determine the antibacterial efficacy of Nisin in comparison with Calcium hydroxide and Chlorhexidine. Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted lower premolar single-rooted teeth were collected and were instrumented with K3 rotary files. Then, root canals were inoculated with a bacterial solution of Enterococcus faecalis. After 21 days, the canals were inoculated with Saline, Nisin, Vancomycin, Calcium hydroxide, and Chlorhexidine. The roots were left for 7 days and on the 8 th day, to investigate the degree of infection of the radicular dentin, specimens of the dentin chips from the full length of the root canal were harvested using a sterile rotary K3 instrument (size 25 6% taper). Results: The results of the present study showed that Nisin and Chlorhexidine showed none of Colony Forming Units (CFU) in their respective group. Conclusion: Within the limits of the study, Nisin was effective in eradicating E. faecalis cells in pure culture and root canal dentin.
Keywords: Antibacterial efficacy, calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, Enterococcus faecalis
|How to cite this article:|
Chinni SK, Veni AB, Srinivasan MR, Rajamani I. An in vitro investigation of a newer intracanal medicament Nisin on Enterococcus faecalis in comparison with chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2011;3:21-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Chinni SK, Veni AB, Srinivasan MR, Rajamani I. An in vitro investigation of a newer intracanal medicament Nisin on Enterococcus faecalis in comparison with chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Apr 18];3:21-4. Available from: http://www.jicdro.org/text.asp?2011/3/1/21/115770
| Introduction|| |
Successful treatment of apical periodontitis depends on elimination of the infective microflora from the necrotic root canal system and favors the healing of the periapex. Apical periodontitis is an inflammatory process involving the periradicular tissues, causing pain and resorption of periradicular structures. It has been shown that anaerobes are the primary etiological agents of apical periodontitis. , One of the factors that contribute to a persistent periradicular infection following root canal therapy is the survival of microorganism in the apical portion of root-filled tooth. Unlike primary endodontic infections, which are polymicrobial in nature and dominated by Gram-negative anaerobic rods, the microorganisms involved in secondary infections are composed of one or a few bacterial species.
Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is a persistent organism that, despite making up a small portion of the microflora in untreated canals, plays a major role in the etiology of persistent periradicular lesions after root canal treatment. It is commonly found in a high percentage of root canal failures and it is able to survive in the root canal as a single organism or as a major component of the flora due to its ability to survive a period of starvation up to 12 months. ,, Thus, it is an important microorganism in cases of endodontic retreatments than in primary root canal treatments.
However, the aberrations in the pulp space morphology contribute to the complexities in the root canal system, such as ramifications, webs, fins, etc., reveal colonization of bacteria in the dentinal tubules other than the main canal which are inaccessible to routine cleaning and shaping. 
Although chemomechanical preparation of root canal is able to reduce the number of bacteria, an intracanal medicament with antibacterial action is required to maximize the disinfection of the root canal system in infected cases.  The need for intracanal medication increases, especially in those cases where the infection is resistant to regular treatment and the therapy cannot be successfully completed due to the presence of pain or continuing exudates. For this reason, a wide variety of antibacterial intracanal medicaments have been used, such as Phenolic derivatives, aldehydes, halides, antibiotics, calcium hydroxide pastes, and chlorhexidine gels. 
Calcium hydroxide plays an important role in endodontics through its versatile action like inducing tissue formation, exerting antibacterial action, and interrupting the nutrient supply to remaining bacteria. 
Chlorhexidine gluconate use in endodontics has been proposed both as irrigant and intracanal medicament. Chlorhexidine ,,, has inhibitory effects on bacteria commonly found in endodontic infections  acting against Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. 
A newer intracanal medicament, Nisin which is a naturally occurring antimicrobial peptide (discovered in 1928) is found to be effective against the E. faecalis. Nisin is produced by Lactococcus lactis and which is a class I bacteriocin. It is used as food preservative and found to be safe in human beings. 
The objectives of the present study is to determine the efficacy of Nisin against E. faecalis and its efficiency is compared with other intracanal medicaments like Calcium hydroxide, Chlorhexidine in human radicular dentin.
| Materials and methods|| |
Preparation of teeth
Fifty extracted lower premolar single-rooted teeth were collected and stored in distilled water until required. The teeth were decoronated using a rotary diamond saw with water irrigation (Gillings-Hamco, Rochester, NY, USA) and only roots with a Type-I root canal configuration  and a round root canal at the cut surface were chosen. The roots were divided into five groups of 10 roots. The root lengths were measured and the working length was determined as 1 mm less than the file length when the tip was visible at the apical foramen. Coronal root structure was removed perpendicular to the long axis of the root to produce roots with a working length of 10 mm.
The canals were instrumented with engine-driven nickel-titanium K3 rotary files (SYBRON ENDO USA) used in a sequential crown down technique to a standardized apical size of 25.4% taper instrument. 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was used as an irrigant during instrumentation with a sterile endodontic needle (Monoject; Sherwood Medical, St Louis, MO, USA) and 5 ml Luer lock syringe (Monoject; Sherwood Medical, St Louis, MO, USA). The roots were then rinsed in water for 30 minutes, then rinsed in 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Vishal biotech, Mumbai, India) for 5 minutes in an ultrasonic bath to remove the smear layer and rinsed in water for a further 30 minutes. Then, the teeth were stored in sterile water until used.
Each root was dried and three layers of clear nail varnish were placed over all external root surfaces with care not to occlude the root canal entrance and teeth were allowed to dry. Then, the roots were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 minutes.
Root canal infection
Bacterial samples of E. faecalis of American Testing Cell Culture of 29212 (ATCC 29212) were taken for this study. Each root canal was inoculated with a bacterial solution up to the canal entrance using a sterile endodontic needle and 5 ml Luer lock syringe. Each canal was sealed with a dental wax and all samples were incubated in a closed container at 37°C for a period of 21 days. The canals were reinoculated with fresh bacterial samples every 3 days. To check for cell viability and purity of culture, samples were taken from each canal with a sterile paper point and inoculated onto Muller Hilton agar plate and incubated aerobically for 24 hours at 37°C.
Root canal medication
After 21 days, the canal contents were aspirated and each canal was rinsed with 5 ml saline using a sterile endodontic needle and 5 ml Luer lock syringe, then dried with sterile paper points. The test medicament was applied to the corresponding groups. In Group I, 5 μl saline (Claris life sciences, India); Group II, 5 μl Nisin (Vasta Biotech, Chennai); Group III, 5 μl Vancomycin; Group IV, 5 μl Calcium Hydroxide (Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA); Group V, 5 μl Chlorhexidine (Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA) was placed using Tuberculin syringe. In this study, saline group (group I) was taken as negative control and Vancomycin (group V) which is the drug of choice for E. faecalis was taken as positive control. The roots were left for 7 days at 37°C after sealing with paraffin wax. On the 8 th day, to investigate the degree of infection of the radicular dentin, specimens of the dentin chips from the full length of the root canal were harvested using a sterile rotary Nickel titanium K3 instrument (size 25 6% taper).
| Results|| |
The results of the present study showed that Nisin and Chlorhexidine showed none of Colony Forming Units (CFU) in their respective group as shown in [Table 1]. Saline group which served as negative control showed 120 CFU (10 5 /ml). Vancomycin group which served as positive control showed no growth of E. faecalis. Calcium hydroxide group showed 84 CFU (10 5 /ml). Statistical analysis was carried out using Students Unpaired 't' test using SPSS windows 12.0 version. P value is considered significant when P value is less than 0.05. Nisin group showed very high significant difference in eradicating E. faecalis than Calcium hydroxide and Saline. Chlorhexidine group also showed very high significant difference in eradicating E. faecalis than Calcium hydroxide and Saline. Nisin and Chlorhexidine are equally effective with positive control Vancomycin in eradicating E. faecalis.
| Discussion|| |
The results of the present study have showed that calcium hydroxide group has 84 CFU. E. faecalis are able to survive in a highly alkaline environment and are resistant to its effects.  The ability of Enterococci to invade dentinal tubules, even under stressed environmental conditions, is thought to play a role in its ability to resist chemomechanical instrumentation and reinfect the root canal system.  The presence of proton pump has been illustrated as a primary resistance mechanism of E. faecalis to resist the alkaline effects of calcium hydroxide in vitro even in an alkaline environment up to pH 11.1.  The buffering capacity of dentine provides a decreasing pH gradient from inner to peripheral root dentine. , A pH of 11.5 is required to effectively kill E. faecalis and this is not commonly achieved within radicular dentine by a Ca(OH) 2 medicament, with an alkalinity of only pH 10.3 being reported in vitro. ,
Chlorhexidine gluconate is a cationic bisbiguanide that acts mainly by adsorbing onto the cell wall of the microorganism and causing leakage of intracellular components.  At low concentrations of chlorhexidine, small molecular weight substances will leak out, resulting in a bacteriostatic effect. At higher concentrations, chlorhexidine has a bactericidal effect due to precipitation and coagulation of the cytoplasm probably caused by protein cross linking.  One of the mechanisms that explain its efficacy is based on the interaction between the positive charge of the molecule and negatively charged phosphate groups on the bacterial cell wall, which allows the chlorhexidine molecule to penetrate into the bacteria with toxic effects. , The results of the present study were in accordance with the previous studies of Gomes et al.
The effect of Nisin as an antibacterial agent is recorded in several studies. Nisin-based mouth wash was tested on beagle dogs and was found to significantly decrease the number of bleeding sites compared with placebo.  An in vitro investigation of the antibacterial effect of Nisin in root canals and canal wall radicular dentin found that Nisin is effective against E. faecalis. 
The most commonly used intracanal medicament Calcium hydroxide is not much effective in eradicating the E. faecalis. This may be due to the resistance and survival techniques of E. faecalis previously mentioned. However, the mode of action of Nisin differs to that of calcium hydroxide and is not reliant on a highly alkaline environment for effective killing.
Severina E et al. have demonstrated that nisin had a wide and powerful bactericidal effect often accompanied by rapid lysis against a large panel of bacterial pathogens. 
From previous studies, the mode of action of nisin have shown that this basic polypeptide acts by inserting into the plasma membrane and triggering the activity of bacterial murein hydrolases resulting in damage or degradation of the peptidoglycan and lysis of the cells. 
Nisin was able to effectively kill all bacteria within the intraradicular canal space. The present study of investigation Nisin as an Intracanal medicament has provided some encouraging results. The ability of nisin to effectively kill E. faecalis by a mechanism that is not reliant on achieving a high pH may provide a means to eliminate this species by a method to which it has no defense mechanism. Nisin is reported to be active against a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria. However, infection of radicular dentinal tubules is dominated by Gram-positive species namely, Streptococci and Enterococci. Given the association of E. faecalis in cases of chronic failure in endodontically treated teeth, a medication aimed specifically at this species may be of value. This may be especially pertinent in cases of conventional endodontic retreatment where E. faecalis is the most commonly recovered species.
| Conclusions|| |
Within the limits of the study, Nisin was effective at eradicating E. faecalis cells in pure culture and was comparable with chlorhexidine, positive control Vancomycin in elimination of E. faecalis from within the root canal system.
| References|| |
|1.||Gomes BP, Drucker DB, Lilley JD. Association of specific bacteria with some endodontic signs and symptoms. Int Endod J 1994;27:291-8. |
|2.||Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB. Clinical significance of dental root canal microflora. J Dent 1996a;29:47-55. |
|3.||Siren EK, Haapasalo MP, Ranta K, Salmi P, Kerosvo EN. Microbiological findings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases selected for microbiology investigation. Int Endod J 1997;30:90-5. |
|4.||Portenier I, Waltimo T, Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. The susceptibility of starved stationary phase and growing cells of Enterococcus faecalis to endodontic medicaments. J Endod 2005;31:380-5. |
|5.||Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: Its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod 2005;32:93-8. |
|6.||Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;54:323-8. |
|7.||Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 1985;18:35-40. |
|8.||Gomes BP, Souza SF, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Zaia AA, Valdrighi L, et al. Effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis in bovine root dentine in vitro. Int Endod J 2003;36:267-75. |
|9.||Siqueira JF, Lopes HP Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: A critical review. Int Endod J 1999;32:361-9. |
|10.||Delany GM, Patterson SS, Miller MS, Newton CW. The effect of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation on the root canal flora of freshly extracted necrotic teeth. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol and Oral Radiol Endod 1982;53:518-23. |
|11.||Vahdaty A, Pittford TR, Wilson RF. Efficacy of chlorhexidine in disinfecting dentinal tubules in vitro. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;9:243-8. |
|12.||Jeasonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994;20:276-8. |
|13.||Siqueria JF Jr, Uzeda M. Intracanal Medicaments: Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of Chlorhexidine, Metronidazole and Calcium hydroxide associated with three vehicles. J Endod 1997;23:167-9. |
|14.||Cervone F, Tronstad L, Hammond B. Antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine in controlled release delivery system. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:33-6. |
|15.||Waler SM. Further in vitro studies on the plaque inhibiting effect of chlorhexidine and its binding mechanisms. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:422-7. |
|16.||Turner SR, Love RM, Lyons KM. An invitro investigation of the antibacterial effect of nisin in root canals and canal wall radicular dentine. Int Endod J 2004;37:664-71. |
|17.||Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol and Endod 1984;58:589-99. |
|18.||Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 2002;35:221-8. |
|19.||Love RM. Enterococcus faecalis- a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J 2001;34:399-405. |
|20.||Wang J, Hume W. Diffusion of hydrogen ion and hydroxyl ion from various sources through dentin. Int Endod J 1988;21:17-26. |
|21.||Nerwich A, Figdor D, Endo D, Messer HH. pH changes in root dentin over a 4-week period following root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1993;96:302-6. |
|22.||Minana M, Carnes D, Walker WI. pH changes at the surface of root dentin after intracanal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2001;27:43-5. |
|23.||Greenstein G, Berman C, Jaffin R. Chlorhexidine an adjunct to periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1986;57:370-6. |
|24.||Kontakiotis E, Nakov M, Georgopoulou M. Invitro study of the indirect action of calcium hydroxide on the anaerobic flora of the root canal. Int Endod J 1995; 28:285-9. |
|25.||Lindskog S, Pierce AM, Blomlof L. Chlorhexidine as a root canal medicament for treating inflammatory lesions in the periodontal space. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;14:186-90. |
|26.||Hugo WB, Longworth AR. Some aspects of the mode of action of chlorhexidine. J Pharm Pharmacol 1964;16:665-72. |
|27.||Howell TH, Fiorellini JP, Blackburn P, Projan SJ, De la Harpe J. Williams RC. The effect of a mouthrinse based on nisin, a bacterocin, on developing plaque and gingivitis in beagle dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:335-9. |
|28.||Severina E, Severin A, Tomasz A. Antibacterial efficacy of nisin against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41:341-7. |
|29.||Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B. Bacteriocins of Gram positive bacteria. Microbiol Rev 1995;59:171-200. |
|This article has been cited by|
||A study on genetic polymorphism in Matrix Metalloproteinases-3 in oral submucous fibrosis patients and in healthy individuals
| ||Preethi A. Poonja,Atul P. Sattur,Krishna N. Burde,Shivaprakash V. Hiremath |
| ||Applied Cancer Research. 2017; 37(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Oral submucous fibrosis secondary to iron deficiency anemia: A case report, etiopathogenesis and management
| ||Preeti Tomar Bhattacharya,T. Khaitan,S. B. Sarkar,R. Sinha |
| ||The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2016; 20(2): 205 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Dental health and odontogenic infections among 6- to 16-year-old German students with special health care needs (SHCN)
| ||Marco Dziwak,Roswitha Heinrich-Weltzien,Kathrin Limberger,Susanne Ifland,Ilka Gottstein,Thomas Lehmann,Ina M. Schüler |
| ||Clinical Oral Investigations. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Ultrasonographic evaluation of oral submucous fibrosis in habitual areca nut chewers
| ||C Krithika,S Ramanathan,D Koteeswaran,C Sridhar,J Satheesh Krishna,M P Shiva Shankar |
| ||Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2013; 42(9): 20120319 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pentoxifylline in Patients with Oral Submucous Fibrosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
| ||Namdeo Prabhu,Sanjay S. Rao,S. M. Kotrashetti,Shridhar D. Baliga,Seema R. Hallikerimath,Punnya V. Angadi,Rakhi Issrani |
| ||Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2013; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|