JICDRO is a UGC approved journal (Journal no. 63927)

   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 93-96

Different surgical approaches for the management of periodontal intrabony defects in the anterior maxilla


1 Department of Periodontics, MGM Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MGM Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ninad Milind Padhye
Department of Periodontics, MGM Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jicdro.jicdro_13_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


This article reports the outcomes of judicious management of periodontal intrabony defects in the anterior maxilla with a long-term follow-up. Two cases reported with a deep probing pocket depth along with an osseous defect due to chronic periodontitis. After completion of nonsurgical periodontal and endodontal therapy, guided tissue regeneration was undertaken for both the cases. Freeze-dried bone allograft along with a biphasic cross-linked collagen membrane was used in the osseos defect. The patients were then recalled for professional scaling on a regular basis. The long-term follow-up of both the cases showed a resolution of the probing pocket depth and radiographic evidence of bone fill in the osseous defect with stable results.

Keywords: Endo-perio lesion, interdisciplinary approach, microsurgery, tissue regeneration


How to cite this article:
Padhye NM, Joshi AA, Agrawal AM. Different surgical approaches for the management of periodontal intrabony defects in the anterior maxilla. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2018;10:93-6

How to cite this URL:
Padhye NM, Joshi AA, Agrawal AM. Different surgical approaches for the management of periodontal intrabony defects in the anterior maxilla. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 21];10:93-6. Available from: http://www.jicdro.org/text.asp?2018/10/2/93/249134




   Introduction Top


Chronic periodontitis is an infectious disease resulting in inflammation within the supporting tissues of the teeth, progressive attachment, and bone loss and is characterized by pocket formation and/or recession of the gingiva.[1] The relationship from the pulp to the periodontium was first described by Simring and Goldberg in 1964.[2] Since then, the term “endo-perio lesion” has been used to describe lesions of varying degrees in both the periodontium and the pulp. Although numerous authors have classified these lesions, the most commonly used classification is by Simon et al.[3] as follows:

  1. Primary endodontic lesion
  2. Primary periodontal lesion
  3. Primary endodontic lesion with secondary periodontal involvement
  4. Primary periodontal lesion with secondary endodontic involvement
  5. True combined lesion.


Successful management of such lesions depends on careful clinical evaluation, accurate diagnosis, and structured approach to treatment planning for both the periodontic and endodontic components. The predictability of periodontal regeneration is influenced by multiple factors related to the patient (e.g., smoking and compliance), defect site (e.g., bony morphology, root topography, and gingival biotype), surgical technique, and early supportive periodontal care.[4] This case series presents periodontal management of a single-rooted anterior teeth with and without endodontic treatment depending on the diagnosis of the type of endo-perio lesion.


   Case Series Top


Case 1

A 32-year-old male reported with a complaint of pus drainage from maxillary anterior tooth for 1 month. He was diagnosed with localized chronic periodontitis with an angular osseous defect [Figure 1]a, and deep pocket of 9 mm [Figure 1]c was found on the mesiobuccal aspect of 12. There was absence of tenderness on percussion and normal response to an electric pulp vitality tester and to a cold test.
Figure 1: (a) preoperative radiograph showing interdental bone loss, (b) 6-month follow-up showing radiographic evidence of bone fill,(c) preoperative probing pocket depth of 9 mm, (d) moat type intrabony defect, (e) intrabony defect grafted with freeze-dried bone allograft, (f) biphasic cross-linked collagen membrane placed, (g) suturing, and (h) 6-month follow-up showing decrease in probing pocket depth to 3 mm

Click here to view


Thorough debridement was done after raising a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap using ultrasonic scaler (Suprasson P5 Booster, Satelec, France), and the granulation tissue was curetted out with Gracey curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). Intrabony moat type defect was present with 12 [Figure 1]d which was grafted with freeze-dried bone allograft (Bone and Tissue Bank, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India) [Figure 1]e and covered with a cross-linked biphasic resorbable collagen membrane (Heal I Guide, Advanced Biotech Products Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India) [Figure 1]f. Flaps were repositioned to attain primary closure using 4-0 black silk sutures [Figure 1]g. The patient was reevaluated again at the end of 6 months where probing pocket depth was reduced to 3 mm [Figure 1]h, and radiographic evidence of bone fill was present [Figure 1]b.

Case 2

A 37-year-old male reported with a complaint of mild pain and pus drainage from upper left front tooth for 4 months. The patient had a history of trauma 2 years back, but the tooth was asymptomatic then. Pain started 4 months back and was dull and throbbing which aggravated on chewing or eating hot foodstuff. The patient also noticed pus discharge from the gums for 2 weeks.

Intraoral clinical examination revealed a deep precipitous pocket measuring 13 mm at the mesiobuccal line angle of the tooth along with purulent discharge [Figure 2]f. A sinus tract was noted at the base of the pocket on the labial mucosa with respect to 22. The tooth gave no response to an electric pulp vitality tester and to a cold test and was tender on percussion. Radiographical examination showed a patent root canal with respect to 22. Radiolucency was noted from the apex of the tooth till the crest of the bone on the mesial surface of the tooth [Figure 2]a. A diagnosis of primary endodontic with the secondary periodontal lesion and pulpal necrosis was inferred. An interdisciplinary treatment plan was formulated for the patient.
Figure 2: (a) preoperative radiograph, (b) working length radiograph,(c) master cone #60 radiograph, (d) postobturation radiograph, (e) 2-year follow-up showing radiographic evidence of bone fill, (f) probing pocket depth of 13 mm, (g) debridement completed, (h) apex of the tooth located using a dental operating microscope, (i) apicoectomy performed, (j) retropreparation done, (k) tooth apex sealed off using mineral trioxide aggregate cement, and (l) sealed apex of the tooth visualized under dental operating microscope

Click here to view


Endodontic access and cleaning and shaping of the canal were carried out using the crown-down and step-back technique up to an apical file size #60 (Mani Inc, Utsunomiya, Japan) [Figure 2]b and [Figure 2]c. Copious irrigation with 5% sodium hypochlorite (I-Dent, Delhi, India) was done during the root canal debridement, and calcium hydroxide powder (ProDent, Ratnagiri) mixed with 0.9% normal saline was placed as an intracanal medicament. Subsequently, the tooth was obturated using gutta-percha and AH Plus Sealer (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) using lateral compaction technique [Figure 2]d.

Following this, sulcular incision and two vertical releasing incisions were given, a full-thickness trapezoidal mucoperiosteal flap was raised, and thorough debridement was performed using hand and ultrasonic instruments [Figure 2]g.

The apex of the tooth was located using a dental operating microscope (OPMI Pico, Carl Zeiss Pvt Ltd, Germany) at ×1.6 [Figure 2]h. Apicoectomy was performed for the tooth where the apical 3 mm of the tooth was resected [Figure 2]i, and retropreparation of 3 mm was done using an ultrasonic tip AS3D (Endosuccess Apical Surgery Kit, Acteon, Merignac, France) [Figure 2]j. A mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) cement (ProRoot MTA, Dentsply Maillefer, USA) was placed at the tip of the tooth to seal off the apex [Figure 2]k and [Figure 2]l.

Freeze-dried bone allograft was placed in and around the defect [Figure 3]a and supported using a bioabsorbable biphasic cross-linked collagen membrane [Figure 3]b. The flap was approximated and supported with sling sutures. The sinus tract opening was closed using sutures [Figure 3]c. The patient was instructed to maintain the area using an interproximal brush. No attempt at probing or deep scaling was made till 1 year following the surgery. At 6 months, radiographic evidence showed a disappearance of the radiolucency. [Figure 2]e and [Figure 3]d show the 2-year follow-up after the surgery, where the probing pocket depth reduced to 5 mm, and radiograph shows the presence of bone fill in the previously existing osseous defect. Thus, an 8-mm gain of clinical attachment along with bone fill in the osseous defect was achieved by this procedure.
Figure 3: (a) osseous defect grafted using freeze-dried bone allograft, (b) biphasic cross-linked collagen membrane placed, (c) suturing, and (d) 2-year follow-up showing decrease in probing pocket depth to 5 mm

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The extent of the bone defect, the grade of mobility, and the involvement of pulpal tissue dictated the difference in treatment protocols in these cases. The first case due to its uncomplicated nature with no endodontic involvement could be managed successfully with surgical periodontal regenerative therapy protocol. With respect to the treatment of intrabony defects, the results of meta-analysis conclude that bone grafts increase bone level, reduce bone loss, increase clinical attachment level, and reduce probing pocket depths when compared to open flap debridement procedures.[5]

Endo-perio lesions are common conditions and often pose a challenge for the diagnosis and treatment. The most important factor to be considered in treating such lesion is to establish the vitality of the involved tooth. Case 2 had a history of trauma along with pulp vitality test showing the nonvital nature of the tooth. Therefore, root canal treatment was initiated for 22. Since the initial apical file size was #45, endodontic cleaning and shaping was done till #60, that is, three times larger. Calcium hydroxide dressings were given every week as the hydroxyl ions released in the aqueous medium caused an antibacterial effect in the root canal system.[6]

Apical root resection of 3 mm was performed to eliminate the apical ramifications.[7] Furthermore, after retropreparation, MTA was chosen as a retrofilling material because of its ability to provide an excellent marginal seal. MTA has been shown to have the capacity to induce cell response stimulating the adherence of osteoblasts to it.[8]

The success rate of the endo-perio combined lesion without concomitant regenerative procedure has been reported to a range from 27% to 37%.[9] This highlights the need for periodontal interventional therapy for a combined lesion. The freeze-dried bone allograft served a dual purpose of space maintenance along with its osteoconductive ability. Bone fill is also enhanced by addition of a graft material to guided tissue regeneration procedures.[10] Predictable outcomes can be achieved for sites treated with a bone graft along with guided tissue regenerative therapy. The combination of the same was used in this case series.


   Conclusion Top


Treatment outcomes for intrabony defects requiring regenerative therapy will be more predictable if a clinician has a detailed knowledge about the diagnosis, treatment sequences, and intervals. An immediate and interdisciplinary management whenever necessary can impede the loss of the natural tooth and delay more complex treatments.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Periodontology AAP. Glossary of periodontal terms. Chicago (IL): The American Academy of Periodontology. 2001.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Simring M, Goldberg M. The pulpal pocket approach: Retrograde periodontitis. J Periodontol 1964;35:22-48.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Simon JH, Glick DH, Frank AL. The relationship of endodontic-periodontic lesions. J Periodontol 1972;43:202-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kao RT, Nares S, Reynolds MA. Periodontal regeneration-intrabony defects: A systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol 2015;86:S77-104.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL, Gunsolley JC. The efficacy of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:227-65.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ruddle CJ, Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. St Louis, USA: Mosby. 2002:231-91.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the Pulp. 6th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1994. p. 539.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Koh ET, McDonald F, Pitt-Ford TR, Torabinejad M. Cellular response to mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1998;24:543–7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hirsch JM, Ahlström U, Henrikson PA, Heyden G, Peterson LE. Periapical surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1979;8:173-85.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schenk RK, Simion M, Rasperini G, Lynch SE, et al. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:321-31.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Series
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed186    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal