Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 3--7

In Vivo Longevity of giomer as compared to other adhesive restorative materials: A systematic review


Rajvi K Bheda, Sanjyot A Mulay, Anita Sanap Tandale 
 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. D Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rajvi K Bheda
Department of Conservative Dentistry Andendodontics, Dr. D Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune - 411 018, Maharashtra
India

In vivo longevity of Giomer as compared to other adhesive restorative materials. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE PubMed, EbscoHost, Scopus, Google Scholar, and manual search using College library resources were searched from January 2005 up to and including September 30, 2018, to identify appropriate studies. A total of 277 articles were identified through the database. Full-text thorough reading of 5 articles were selected and were assessed for eligibility. Further, these five articles were included in the study. At 1-year Ketac Nano and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations were better retained in noncarious cervical lesions, while superior color match and surface finish were observed with Giomer restorations. At 6 years, the HEMA-containing Self Etch adhesive Giomer restorations showed a rather high failure frequency.


How to cite this article:
Bheda RK, Mulay SA, Tandale AS. In Vivo Longevity of giomer as compared to other adhesive restorative materials: A systematic review.J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2020;12:3-7


How to cite this URL:
Bheda RK, Mulay SA, Tandale AS. In Vivo Longevity of giomer as compared to other adhesive restorative materials: A systematic review. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 24 ];12:3-7
Available from: https://www.jicdro.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0754;year=2020;volume=12;issue=1;spage=3;epage=7;aulast=Bheda;type=0